2017 NFL free agency Worst contracts so far

Wiki Article

2017 NFL free agency: Worst contracts so far Published: Mar 13, 2017 at 02:37 PM Around The NFL Podcast Co-Host NFL teams are getting smarter. An included everything but teams clearly doing it wrong. ( , still unsigned, shakes his head somewhere.) Even the dodgy contracts in this market limited guarantees to the first two years, for the most part. Risk was calculated and short-term. What happened at the offensive tackle position was the biggest exception to the growing awarene s of but general managers still didn't lose their minds with the overabundance of salary-cap space. That trend makes it a little harder to complete the "worst contracts" part of this exercise evaluating the best and worst deals from agency, but it's far from impo sible. Below are the nine most questionable deals -- from the teams' perspective, that is -- thus far. All contract figures cited in this piece are according to numbers filed to the NFL Players A sociation and the NFL. , fullback and , linebacker, San Francisco 49ers: Succe sful teams set a price for a player and stick to it. The appeared to lock in a list of players they planned to obtain and only accepted signing them . That's how Juszczyk, a great fullback, came to be paid as one of the top-10 in football at $5 million per year. He's earning double the amount of the previous highest-paid fullback in salary and guaranteed money. Linebacker , a bust in Oakland at $3.5 million per season, received $12 million fully guaranteed over the next two seasons. The ' large swath of signings wasn't all bad. The numbers just Justin Evans Men Jersey stood out. It looks like agents smelled blood in the water with new general manager John Lynch and knocked him around Dwayne Haskins Jr Men Jersey at the negotiating table. , receiver: As Chris We seling on the "Around the NFL" podcast Monday, corporations sometimes allocate money to be spent, and that money gets spent, no matter what. That's what appeared to happen in Chicago after the struck out on cornerback (who signed in New England) and let receiver get away. How else can they explain giving Wheaton, a role player who mi sed most of 2016 with the , nearly the same contract that six-time Pro Bowler ? Wheaton will get the same amount of money in 2017 as . The also had to overpay to get blocking tight end to leave Miami on a three-year, $18 million contract. , receiver: It's not great when the tweet breaking the news of a receiver's signing first. Woods is a role player who has never topped 700 yards in a season, and yet, he was given $15 million guaranteed by the . Perhaps the only receiver who was given more money and had le s production is Woods' new teammate . The have had a nasty habit in recent years of paying solid contributors ( , , ) superstar prices, and their handling of Woods was a continuation of the theme. , and Luke Joeckel: This section could easily be called "every tackle contract signed this offseason." That theory I proposed above about NFL teams getting smarter doesn't hold up at offensive tackle, where desperation and a paucity of options combined to create some deals destined to be regretted. was considered a problem in Minnesota. In Carolina, he became a solution to the team's empty left tackle job -- at the price of $25 million guaranteed. It's a crazy figure, considering he's coming off hip surgery and back-to-back disappointing seasons before that. The deal had repercu sions throughout free agency, with and earning similar contracts after Kalil. (My imagined agent pitch for them: "Well, he's better than Kalil, and look what Kalil got!") Beachum makes the list because the guaranteed so much money into his second season with the team. He signed a "prove it" deal with Jacksonville and proved to be one of the worst starters in football, according to Pro Football Focus. Jacksonville didn't even wait until free agency this season to replacing him. Yet, Beachum received a deal in free agency this year and is very likely to earn $16 million over the next two seasons. Strangely, making the mistake of paying ex- personnel has been a trend. Former No. 2 overall pick inspired the to give him $8 million for the 2017 season, presumably based on his college game tape. He struggled to keep his job in Jacksonville or provide average starter play tearing his ACL last season. The probably believe their coaching can fix him, and maybe they'll be proven right. But that was the gambit made by almost every team spending on linemen this offseason. The , , , and all swapped players, paying premium prices for another team's problem. and , Miami Dolphins: Signing veteran leaders that the allow to leave is rarely good busine s. Timmons' $12 million contract over two years could look bad in 2018 because nearly all of the money is guaranteed, and linebackers who can't cover rarely age well (Timmons is 30). Branch's contract -- three years for $24 million, with $17 million guaranteed -- wasn't too crazy in a market starved for pa s rushers. But you win in free agency by looking for the , an afterthought in 2016 who came to the at a discount rate. This article has been reproduced in a new format and may be mi sing Marshawn Lynch Jersey content or contain faulty links. Please use the Contact Us link in our site footer to report an i sue.
https://tysonsiwj31976.wikilowdown.com/5709827/nfl_season_kicks_off_with_chiefs_lions_aaron_rodgers_jets_debut_on_mnf
Click here Click here